![]() To make things faster, I could reduce the frequency separation to an action. Using filters like Smart Blur and High Pass, I used the technique of frequency separation to clean up the skin. I could access everything that the camera has saved, and manipulate it manually. I could fix the exposure, contrast, highlights, and more, change the saturation or luminosity of individual colors, and even sharpen the image or remove the noise. When I opened it in Photoshop, I got a chance to edit the RAW properties directly in the default plugin, called Camera RAW. ![]() My photo is saved in NEF format, which is a type of RAW file. It's not possible to show all the functions of Photoshop during one edit, but I hope this mix will give you a good overview. I'll include basic retouching and elements of photo manipulation, as well as styling the text. This should give us a better idea of the real capabilities of these programs in comparison to Photoshop. ![]() I'm going to edit a photo in Photoshop, and then try to do the same in each of these three. I've picked three programs: GIMP, Krita, and Photopea. You'll learn that "free programs are only good for basic editing" and "you need Photoshop for anything serious", but nobody will tell you exactly what functions Photoshop has that free photo editors lack. If you search for the answer on the Internet, it's hard to get anything specific. Why not use one of them instead? Everyone will say, duh, Photoshop is for professionals, free alternatives are for amateurs! But what does that mean, really? What's so professional about Photoshop, except its price? Adobe Photoshop has long been an industry standard, and even though it's famous for being costly, it's the first choice for most people when it comes to photo editing.īut there are many other programs, available for free, marketed as "Photoshop alternatives".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |